wiki_ghostguild/content/curriculum/PS Guides/1-coop-principles-power.md
Jennie Robinson Faber 136ee2442b Add Coop Foundations Curriculum content and import script
9 session pages and 10 PS Guide markdown files for the Baby Ghosts
cooperative foundations curriculum. Import script creates documents in
Outline wiki with cross-links between paired session/PS Guide pages.
2026-03-09 14:33:06 +00:00

143 lines
No EOL
4.1 KiB
Markdown

# 1: Coop Principles & Power
## **What happens in session**
In this session, we cover cooperative history and lineages, crediting Global South, Indigenous, Black, women's traditions, not just Rochdale. We also review the 7 ICA Principles.
The theme is moving from principles to personal values.
:::tip
**Homework assigned:** individual journaling, team values map (with PS), and individual prep for The Talk (Session 2).
:::
### :eyes: **Your role during session**
- Observe small group activity (cooperative lineage sharing) - note whose stories are shared
- Listen for how studios talk about values - vague or specific?
## **This week's Studio Support Meeting: Values Mapping**
### **📚 Materials**
- Studio Miro board with Values Mapping template
- 7 Principles reference
### **👆 Before the session**
- Confirm everyone completed their individual journaling (Session 1 homework)
- Ensure the studio Miro board has the template
- Have the 7 Principles visible (on the board or screen-shared)
### **🌊 Session flow**
#### **Check-in (5 min)**
Individual sharing (15-20 min) - Each person shares 3-5 values from their individual reflection.
Prompts:
- "What values came up when you did the journaling?"
- "You don't need to explain or justify."
As they share: each person adds values to the Miro board (stickies in their colour/section). No discussion - just capture.
Watch for: someone dominating or going first every time; someone staying quiet - invite them in gently; values that sound the same but might mean different things to different people.
#### **Noticing patterns (10-15 min)**
Look at the board together.
Prompts:
- "What do you notice?"
- "Where do you see overlap?"
- "Any surprises?"
- "Are there values that seem similar but might mean different things to different people?"
> Example to offer: "Transparency" - does it mean open documents? Open conversations? Both? Neither? What exactly is meant?
**Connecting to the 7 Principles (10 min)**
Look at the ICA principles together.
**Prompts**:
- "Do you see connections between your values and these principles?"
- "Draw lines or group things if it helps."
- This can be loose - don't let them fixate on making a beautiful diagram. The point is seeing that their values connect to a larger cooperative tradition.
#### **To bring back to Session 2 (5 min)**
**Prompts**:
- "What's one thing you learned about where your team aligns or diverges?"
- * *You'll share this in Session 2 - doesn't need to be polished.*
- Have someone write it down or capture it on the board.
#### **Community agreements contribution (5 min)**
"Based on this conversation, are there 1-2 values you'd propose adding to the cohort community agreements?" Capture these to bring back to the full group.
### :star: **Tips**
If someone is dominating:
- "Let's hear from someone who hasn't shared yet."
If no one talks… awkward silence:
- "Take a minute to look at the board silently. What stands out?"
If tension emerges
- "Sounds like there are some different perspectives here. That's useful but we don't need to resolve it today."
If they want to debate definitions:
- "It's okay to mean different things. The goal is simply to notice where you might need to clarify later."
If time runs short:
- Prioritize steps 2-3 (sharing and noticing). The principles connection and agreements contribution can be done async if needed.
### **🏁After the session**
- Note any tensions/surprises for your PS check-in
- Remind the team to bring their learnings to Session 2
### **👉 Also this week**
#### **Make sure they're prepping for The Talk**
Session 2 homework includes individual prep on four topics: financial reality, time/availability, skills/contributions, decision-making styles.
:::warning
They need to *write their answers down* before Session 2. Check that they're doing this!
:::
### :triangular_flag_on_post: **Red flags to watch for**
- A studio that can't name any values beyond "we want to make good games" - don't we all! Too vague.
- One person speaking for the group about "our" values
- Values that are all abstract with no grounding in practice