jennie/wiki_ghostguild
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Update curriculum source files to current versions

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Jennie Robinson Faber 2026-03-09 15:51:18 +00:00
parent 136ee2442b
commit 8549cb0252
20 changed files with 467 additions and 466 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

34
content/curriculum/PS Guides/7-conflict-resolution-collective-care.md
View file

@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
## Pre-session
- Review Baby Ghosts' [Conflict Resolution Policy](https://publish.obsidian.md/baby-ghosts-corp-docs/Public/Policies/Conflict+Resolution+Policy) before session — this is the template participants will adapt for homework
- Review Baby Ghosts' [Conflict Resolution Policy](https://publish.obsidian.md/baby-ghosts-corp-docs/Public/Policies/Conflict+Resolution+Policy) before session – this is the template participants will adapt for homework
- Check in with your studio about how their compensation discussions went; any friction that came up is useful for this session
## **What happens in session**
@ -11,17 +11,17 @@ The heaviest session. Studios learn to reframe conflict as data (not failure), d
:::warning
**Before this session:** review Baby Ghosts' [Conflict Resolution Policy](https://publish.obsidian.md/baby-ghosts-corp-docs/Public/Policies/Conflict+Resolution+Policy). Check in with your studio about how their compensation discussions went — any friction that came up is useful material for this session.
**Before this session:** review Baby Ghosts' [Conflict Resolution Policy](https://publish.obsidian.md/baby-ghosts-corp-docs/Public/Policies/Conflict+Resolution+Policy). Check in with your studio about how their compensation discussions went – any friction that came up is useful material for this session.
:::
### :eyes: **Your role during session**
- Observe how your studio responds to the conflict reframing — relief, resistance, or discomfort can all be informative
- Watch the activity closely — are they able to use behaviourally-specific feedback or do they slide into judgments?
- Observe how your studio responds to the conflict reframing – relief, resistance, or discomfort can all be informative
- Watch the activity closely – are they able to use behaviourally-specific feedback or do they slide into judgments?
- Note whether anyone identifies conflicts they've been avoiding
- Pay attention to body language during the accountability discussion — who checks out? Who leans in?
- Pay attention to body language during the accountability discussion – who checks out? Who leans in?
### 👆 **Your role after session**
@ -42,15 +42,15 @@ The heaviest session. Studios learn to reframe conflict as data (not failure), d
### :world_map: **Context**
This PS meeting has two parts: (1) helping the studio name an avoided tension, and (2) reviewing the conflict resolution template together. The order matters — naming a real tension first gives the template review practical grounding. But read the room. If the tension-naming conversation goes deep, let it run and abbreviate the template review. The real work is the conversation, not the document.
This PS meeting has two parts: (1) helping the studio name an avoided tension, and (2) reviewing the conflict resolution template together. The order matters – naming a real tension first gives the template review practical grounding. But read the room. If the tension-naming conversation goes deep, let it run and abbreviate the template review. The real work is the conversation, not the document.
This may be the most emotionally demanding PS meeting. Be prepared to hold space without trying to fix everything.
### **👆 Before the session**
- Review the Baby Ghosts conflict resolution policy and procedures yourself — know the structure well enough to guide a discussion
- Reflect on what you observed during the session and the compensation discussion last week — is there an unresolved tension you've noticed?
- Review the Baby Ghosts conflict resolution policy and procedures yourself – know the structure well enough to guide a discussion
- Reflect on what you observed during the session and the compensation discussion last week – is there an unresolved tension you've noticed?
- Check your own readiness. If you're carrying a lot from your own studio or personal life, be honest with yourself about your capacity to hold space today.
@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ This isn't a throwaway question. Give it real space. If someone needs to talk, l
:::
"What conflict or tension has your studio been avoiding? It doesn't have to be big — small avoidances are actually great to examine."
"What conflict or tension has your studio been avoiding? It doesn't have to be big – small avoidances are actually great to examine."
**If no one speaks up immediately**, let the silence sit. Count to 15 in your head before you intervene. Then try:
@ -138,11 +138,11 @@ If it gets heated:
If someone minimizes:
- "You said 'it's not a big deal' — but you brought it up. Can you say more about why it's on your mind?"
- "You said 'it's not a big deal' – but you brought it up. Can you say more about why it's on your mind?"
If someone deflects to structural issues to avoid interpersonal ones (or vice versa):
- "It can be both. What's the structural part, and what's the interpersonal part? Which one are you more comfortable talking about — and which one are you avoiding?"
- "It can be both. What's the structural part, and what's the interpersonal part? Which one are you more comfortable talking about – and which one are you avoiding?"
If the template review feels abstract:
@ -151,18 +151,18 @@ If the template review feels abstract:
### **🏁 After the session**
- Note how the tension-naming went — did something real surface, or did the studio stay safe?
- Note how they responded to the conflict resolution template — did they engage or treat it as a formality?
- Note how the tension-naming went – did something real surface, or did the studio stay safe?
- Note how they responded to the conflict resolution template – did they engage or treat it as a formality?
- If any individual seems affected, follow up with them directly
- Bring observations to your PS check-in — especially anything that concerns you about studio dynamics
- Bring observations to your PS check-in – especially anything that concerns you about studio dynamics
## :triangular_flag_on_post: **Red flags to watch for**
- A studio that insists they have no conflicts — avoidance is not peace
- A studio that insists they have no conflicts – avoidance is not peace
- Someone who identifies a conflict but then immediately retracts: "never mind, it's fine"
- Conflict always attributed to one person — scapegoating
- Conflict always attributed to one person – scapegoating
- Political framing used to avoid naming emotional experience (the emotional-political conflation trap from the session)
- A studio that wants the policy "just in case" but clearly has an active, unnamed conflict
- Someone who seems shut down or dissociated — check in with them privately after
- Someone who seems shut down or dissociated – check in with them privately after
- Performative agreement: "I'm fine with whatever the group decides" when they clearly aren't