jennie/wiki_ghostguild
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Update curriculum source files to current versions

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Jennie Robinson Faber 2026-03-09 15:51:18 +00:00
parent 136ee2442b
commit 8549cb0252
20 changed files with 467 additions and 466 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

23
content/curriculum/PS Guides/1-coop-principles-power.md
View file

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
In this session, we cover cooperative history and lineages, crediting Global South, Indigenous, Black, women's traditions, not just Rochdale. We also review the 7 ICA Principles.
The theme is moving from principles to personal values.
The theme is *moving from principles to personal values*.
:::tip
@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ The theme is moving from principles to personal values.
### :eyes: **Your role during session**
- Observe small group activity (cooperative lineage sharing) - note whose stories are shared
- Listen for how studios talk about values - vague or specific?
- Observe small group activity (cooperative lineage sharing) – note whose stories are shared
- Listen for how studios talk about values – vague or specific?
## **This week's Studio Support Meeting: Values Mapping**
@ -38,16 +38,16 @@ The theme is moving from principles to personal values.
#### **Check-in (5 min)**
Individual sharing (15-20 min) - Each person shares 3-5 values from their individual reflection.
Individual sharing (15-20 min) – Each person shares 3-5 values from their individual reflection.
Prompts:
- "What values came up when you did the journaling?"
- "You don't need to explain or justify."
As they share: each person adds values to the Miro board (stickies in their colour/section). No discussion - just capture.
As they share: each person adds values to the Miro board (stickies in their colour/section). No discussion – just capture.
Watch for: someone dominating or going first every time; someone staying quiet - invite them in gently; values that sound the same but might mean different things to different people.
Watch for: Someone dominating or going first every time; someone staying quiet – invite them in gently; values that sound the same but might mean different things to different people.
#### **Noticing patterns (10-15 min)**
@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ Prompts:
- "Are there values that seem similar but might mean different things to different people?"
> Example to offer: "Transparency" - does it mean open documents? Open conversations? Both? Neither? What exactly is meant?
> Example to offer: "Transparency" – does it mean open documents? Open conversations? Both? Neither? What exactly is meant?
**Connecting to the 7 Principles (10 min)**
@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ Look at the ICA principles together.
- "Do you see connections between your values and these principles?"
- "Draw lines or group things if it helps."
- This can be loose - don't let them fixate on making a beautiful diagram. The point is seeing that their values connect to a larger cooperative tradition.
– This can be loose – don't let them fixate on making a beautiful diagram. The point is seeing that their values connect to a larger cooperative tradition.
#### **To bring back to Session 2 (5 min)**
@ -81,8 +81,7 @@ Look at the ICA principles together.
**Prompts**:
- "What's one thing you learned about where your team aligns or diverges?"
- * *You'll share this in Session 2 - doesn't need to be polished.*
- Have someone write it down or capture it on the board.
- You'll share this in Session 2 – doesn't need to be polished. Have someone write it down or capture it on the board.
#### **Community agreements contribution (5 min)**
@ -103,7 +102,7 @@ If no one talks… awkward silence:
- "Take a minute to look at the board silently. What stands out?"
If tension emerges
If tension emerges:
- "Sounds like there are some different perspectives here. That's useful but we don't need to resolve it today."
@ -138,6 +137,6 @@ They need to *write their answers down* before Session 2. Check that they're doi
### :triangular_flag_on_post: **Red flags to watch for**
- A studio that can't name any values beyond "we want to make good games" - don't we all! Too vague.
- A studio that can't name any values beyond "we want to make good games" – don't we all! Too vague.
- One person speaking for the group about "our" values
- Values that are all abstract with no grounding in practice